Alan's Story
I chose Nanoknife after carefully considering my options. I met with a number of PCa specialists and an Oncologist and decided that radical prostatectomy (which was being promoted) was not proportionate to my G3+4 and eventually met (name deleted), who agreed that focal therapy was proportionate and that given location etc that Nanoknife would be the correct choice.
Yes
Because the side effects were minimal and short lived, my post procedure MRI showed that the 3+4 lesion had been destroyed and one year, later my PSA is 1.5, from its pre treatment peak of 4.65.
By sharing your experience of prostate cancer on the infopool you can help others. Your experience is valuable as they go through their own journey. Help make the prostate cancer community stronger.